run the motor test one propeller at a time with the quad secured down and see if there is any large difference in z axis vibration between the motors, it should be obvious if one has much higher vibration than the rest.
The flight controller isn’t making the vibrations it’s just picking them up, the only moving parts are the motors and propellers so it has to be one of those making it shake.
I conducted a comparative test between Cube Orange and Orange+. Previously, I affixed my Cube to the frame firmly using VHBs. I repeated the same process for Cube+, but encountered significantly higher vibration levels. Reverting to the original Cube Orange resolved the issue. Despite experimenting with various foams and VHBs for Cube+, the vibration levels remained largely unchanged. I plan to mount Cube on a vibration-dampened mount next, and I’ll provide updates on my findings.
This is the antivibration mount to use for a Cube and carrier, after exhausting all other possibilities.
Usually wiring and frame stiffness are the major contributors, after motors and props of course.
The typical/cheap antivibration mounts that are flat plates with 4 balls are NOT suitable.
Of note, those cheap ones with the silicone ball mounts that Shawn mentioned above seem to work well to tame the vibration on my combustion engined rovers.
But, as he mentioned, I’ve never had good success with one on a Copter and completely concur with the recommendation against them for that application.
That could be OK - check if there is clipping.
You will need to examine a log periodically to ensure vibrations dont become excessive as motor bearings age, props become damaged and so on.
The harmonic notch filter configuration will be important.
I think Phillip said not to vibration mount his cube that was a few years ago. BTW I have some nasty vibrations on a new build going to do some testing to see why.