There is also one other significant difference, and that is with Lua scripting. Scripts written for the Taranis are not compatible with the Horus, as the Horus uses “widgets” for its TN display. While Lua scripting for the Taranis is very well documented, it is not for the Horus.
If you use a “packaged” script like yaapu, then no problem. If you write your own like I do it is more difficult on the Horus. I have a custom script for helicopters that has dual-needle tachometer for rotor/engine rpm, gauges for engine temp, generator, SOG and KIAS etc… Various people have tried (unsuccessfully) to port it to the Horus.
I can program with Lua just fine. It’s not all that different from C++ but some things are different like functions() have to be declared ahead of a call, variables are declared on-the-fly, and so on. But unfortunately I don’t have time to do custom programming for other people.
SmartDave convinced me and I have ordered the Horus X10S. I am hoping that I will like it. As I am a hardcore Futaba guy and I have only 3 Taranis X9D compatible Rx so far, may not be be bad idea to switch to Access. If I really like it, then I will sell my X9D
Now the questions coming to mind are;
R9D would not work with X10S…What is my alternative for long range?
X10S receiver choices are little confusing so far to me;
a) Archer
b) Rx Series
Still trying to understand the differences. Not sure if these Rx has an S Port and what’s the advantage of FPort?
Also fport = only 1 wire to need rc in also telemetry data and are you using fport protocol you i will be don’t need yaapu cable and there is lots of advantages showing on video.
Frsky’s R9 system is their long range option. You will need a Tx module and there are several Rx’s in the family. Range is decent depending on the use case. I have 4 or 5 different Rx’s (MM’s, mini’s, mini +, standard R9) and they perform OK.
Any of the 2.4Ghz Rx’s will work with the X10S’s internal radio.
a)Archer is the ACCESS version of the XM+ w/ telemetry. Low cost, lower range. Haven’t tried them, likely popular with the mini-quad/racing crowd.
b) Do you mean R9 series? If so comments above.
Fport is single wire RC and telemetry with less latency. This may be quite helpful when bi-directional Frsky telemetry is available.
Regarding ACCESS, if you are starting with Frsky its the way to go. I have older Frsky hardware that is not compatible so I’m out of luck unless I want to replace a slew of Rx’s on models, buy a new Tx and buy a new R9 module.
Thanks… Is it safe to assume the R9 series long range plug in module will work with X10S? $24.00 dollars on AliExpress to me is a no brainer not to buy it
@Moksh ok I got it what it means one wire. Both sPort and FPort over same wire…both protocols are mixed so don’t need to run two wires from RX to FC.
Furthermore, so all my current FrSky Rx such as X8R will work with X10S. Thats good. This means I only need to sell my X9D plus and keep the rest of the hardware including Individual LiPo cell voltage monitors (the main reason i started using FrSky because Futaba can only do total voltage monitoring via its Rx, no individual cell monitoring supported). I have not seen one out there.
Yes, The R9M is a JR module form factor. Make sure you are buying the 2019 version or you won’t have ACCESS. There is a External Power input difference also. After posting that I had no problem using a 3S Lipo for external power I had to eat some crow when that module failed…
Both Telemetry and RC Control over one port. Otherwise it’s Sbus and Sport (telemetry)on 2 separate ports. One many boards this takes 2 UARTS.
Right. I’m using a 1300mah 2S on my older module otherwise the X9D battery goes flat very quickly if it’s switching to 1W (FCC adaptive power mode).
Funny but one annoying feature of the old X9D’s was the noise from the speaker from a module in the bay. But now I consider it a feature as it tells me when it switches power
No. Well, maybe the Horus is different not sure. But the module will use the source with the highest voltage so when you see the radio battery voltage start to drop then the Lipo is at the same voltage as the internal battery.
Ok can we force the R9M to only use external battery? Then maybe we can redesign the R9M housing and fit in 2S battery inside it. Just thinking out loud. Much cleaner solution…
and there is lots of advantages showing on video.
