Q_TAILSIT_ANGLE must always be less than Q_ANGLE_MAX?
If I choose Q_ANGLE_MAX = 30, because I don’t need a nerve wing, then I can’t give Q_TAILSIT_ANGLE one high value to have time to accelerate in transition. Maybe increasing Q_M_TSHT_HOVER can make up for it
Start with Q_TAILSIT_ANGLE and Q_TRANSITION_MS at the default values
Set Q_M_THST_HOVER to the value needed to hover
That should result in a reasonably good transition as a starting point for tuning.
Hello Syam,
In my humble opinion I think it is better to understand and deepen understanding each parameter. It can be a bit tedious but it is more beneficial in the long run. A copy & paste can be counterproductive for your model
I have read all the 2k comments for the last 4days and set the parameters…but qhover and qloiter its not behaving as the way needed . Because iam using Skydroid rc…there is no proper trim options…
I started with non vectored, and changed to vectored because of bad experiences.
And when you read all posts, you may noticed that not many others hat good results. To unstable especially in wind.
For qhover or qloiter or Copters you do not need trims at the TX.
Guys my plane is moving towards right side continuously and horizon is showing flight is rolled to right…
When i turn stick to left , both horizon and flight came to level . When released again moving towards right.
Why this happens. Flight was in stabilize mode.
Its non vectored
Hello friends. I fly the FX-61 in the tailsitter configuration, with your help I managed to achieve stable flight and transitions. Not so long ago the FX-79 came, I installed more powerful SUNNYSKY X3520 motors and RDS3115 servos on it. The files for printing were kindly provided by lorbass, for which many thanks to him. The following problem arose: the FX-79 refuses to hang stably, oscillations occur along the pitch axis and I cannot defeat them. Tried different PID options. Who faced this problem and how to deal with it? Could it be the servos? My config file:FX-79.param (21.1 KB)
That looks great! What deflection can you get on the motors with that design? It looks simple and lightweight. I wonder if it would avoid some of the gyroscopic torque issues that a direct tilt servo mount has…?