Precision Landing Method Question

Hello there!

I am trying my hand at precision landing with opencv. I have achieved adequate results in gazebo by just using a P-controller that sets the X/Y velocities based off my detected error from an aruco marker.

My question is, is it worth it to instead make use of the landing_target message and send in angle_x/y? I abandoned this path as this MAVLink message doesn’t seem to work in SITL or Gazebo-SITL for me, AND the angle_x/y approach is far less intuitive to me.

Precision Landing works ok with SITL you must have something wrong in your message

@fnoop made a pretty good system here http://github.com/goodrobots/vision_landing

1 Like