I have an QuadPlane running ArduPlane 4.6.3 here (4 motors, with the front two tiltable). During the transition from QLOITER to FBWA or CRUISE, it starts spinning fast around the yaw axis. Fortunately, each time I was able to land it safely by switching back to QLOITER.
The log shows one motor diagonal ramping up while the other ramps down. However, I don’t think it’s a desync or a motor spinning out of control—I likely would have heard that. A mechanical failure is also unlikely, given that it is absolutely stable and controllable in QLOITER.
I am also certain that I have assigned the motors correctly, as the motor test in Mission Planner activates the right motors.
I have already found other posts describing very similar problems: Massive yaw spin during transition of VTOL QuadPlane( 2 front motor tilt)transition yaw swing Quadplane Transition Problems
At least one user reports that switching to vectored tilt solved the issue. But I only want to do that if nothing else works.
Is there a specific reason you chose Q_TILT_TYPE 0 (continuous tiltrotor) even though you obviously have two tilt servos? Why not Q_TILT_TYPE 2 (Vectored Yaw)?
During hover, motors 3 and 4 require significantly less power than motors 1 and 2. Is it possible that the motors aren’t aligned properly, causing the propellers to rotate at an angle during hover and thus generating torque around the vertical axis?
You nailed it! I just had an amazing first flight with transition.
This point really should have been mentioned in the documentation – or did I overlook it?
Hi Rolf,
yes, there is a reason I chose Q_TILT_TYPE 0 (continuous tiltrotor). Before I build this specific aircraft, I had a number of tricopter VTOL frames. These had continously all kind of trouble with the tilt servos. So I decided to minimize the servo movements and hopefully all the trouble here with the current frame. Do you think this is disadvantageous?
And you are right regarding motor 3 and 4. This is something I need to have an eye on it. But currently I have no idea what is going on. At least front and back motor arms measure the same length from CG. Arms are solid CFK tube and shouldn’t have significant flex.