yeah, and it has quite old firmware. No mavlink I believe, and a horrible GCS
That’s a very interesting project. Will you be sharing the design files of this fully open source design?
Holy bro, the flight controller looks much better inside than CUAV.
However, the vibration dampening seems ineffective in this case.
Do you have an FFT log for that board?
I think it’s possible to work on the mechanical design of pre-tensioned silicone dampers that can filter out the main spectrum of vibrations.
Additionally, interchangeable dampers for different frequencies could be implemented.
What looks much better, the PCB design or the general insides housing for those PCBs? I don’t have FFT log yet, only flight logs. I mean, the least I can say is that on a gas UAV I have a green vibration tab on all RPMs using just a Chinese made vibration platform sitting under the flight controller, which costs like $2.
Interchangeable dampers is a cool idea. For me personally, I don’t have any specific issues flying on electric drones, I sensed vibration problems only with gas powered drones
Does Holybro have at least some schematics in .pdf on GitHub? Same as CUAV does there GitHub - cuav/hardware
I manufacture a flight controller similar to the cube series (IE main FC and carrier are separate) which is based on the fmu-v6 standards with some slight tweaks, the main advantage being it is easy to develop a carrier (no external circuitry required)
There’s more info at CBUnmanned.com and if you follow through to the wiki I’m sure there’s something of use there for you! Otherwise feel free to ask any q’s!
Send photos of your vibration isolation for IMU
All our IMUs are hard mounted to the FC Stamp. Users can either soft mount the carrier + FC or use the extra spi bus for an externally vibration mounted IMU.
Do you have a video of test flights on gas UAVs? Full auto mode (waypoints mission)
what about new BMO088 IMU, anyone has any reviews or thought about it?
@Airdroper I hope you’re familiar with the pixhawk standards, and they might provide you with some guidance.
Nice idea! But to be honest, price is a little bit high.
@Airdroper
You may have seen this already, but maybe not:
This carrier board has been made by an American company, don’t know which software they use, PX4 or AP.
I like the layout. Power supply (probably doubled), GNSS receiver and communications modem directly attached.